CVE-2026-68904: node-opcua: TCP Socket Leak (FIN-WAIT-2) via keepalive reconnection cycle - Resource Exhaustion
SUMMARY ------- A combination of bugs in node-opcua causes unlimited TCP socket accumulation (FIN-WAIT-2 state) during automatic reconnection, leading to memory exhaustion and eventual container/process crash (OOM kill). The issue is triggered by the default configuration (keepSessionAlive: true) when the OPC UA server has clock skew relative to the client. Affected version: Tested on 2.169.0 (latest as of April 2026). ENVIRONMENT ----------- - Node.js: v24.11.0 - node-opcua: 2.169.0 - OS: Linux (containerized via Podman, slirp4netns networking) - OPC UA Server: Industrial PLC (opc.tcp endpoint), clock skew of ~50 minutes ahead of client - Client config: keepSessionAlive: true (default), keepAliveInterval: 3000, securityMode: None, securityPolicy: None ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS ------------------- Bug #1 - ClientTCP_transport._on_ACK_response() uses socket.end() instead of socket.destroy() File: node-opcua-transport/src/client_tcp_transport.ts, _on_ACK_response() method When the HEL/ACK handshake fails during a reconnection attempt, the error handler calls socket.end(): if (err || !data) { externalCallback(err || new Error("no data")); if (this._socket) { this._socket.end(); // <- sends TCP FIN, leaves socket in FIN-WAIT-2 } } socket.end() sends a TCP FIN and waits for the peer to close its side. If the peer doesn't respond (common with PLCs), the socket remains in FIN-WAIT-2 state indefinitely, leaking file descriptors and memory. During rapid reconnection cycles (triggered by Bug #2 below), every failed HEL/ACK creates a new leaked socket. --- Bug #2 - ClientSessionKeepAliveManager._ping_server() treats BadInvalidTimestamp as network outage File: node-opcua-client/src/client_session_keepalive_manager.ts, _ping_server() method The keepalive manager reads Server.ServerStatus.CurrentTime on each ping cycle. If the server responds with BadInvalidTimestamp (because the client's RequestHeader.timestamp falls outside the server's tolerance window due to clock skew), the manager treats this as a fatal network error: // Any error -> emit("failure") -> terminateConnection() -> forceConnectionBreak() This triggers a full transport-level reconnection on every keepalive cycle (every keepAliveInterval ms). Combined with Bug #1, each reconnection attempt leaks one TCP socket in FIN-WAIT-2. Impact amplification: With keepAliveInterval: 3000 (3 seconds), the client leaks ~20 sockets/minute, ~1200/hour, exhausting resources in hours. REPRODUCTION STEPS ------------------ 1. Set up an OPC UA server with a clock skewed more than the server's timestamp tolerance ahead of the client. 2. Connect using node-opcua with default settings (keepSessionAlive: true). 3. Monitor TCP sockets: ss -antp | grep FIN-WAIT-2 | wc -l 4. Observe FIN-WAIT-2 count growing continuously (approximately one per keepalive interval). 5. Eventually the process runs out of file descriptors or memory and crashes. SUGGESTED FIXES --------------- For Bug #1 (_on_ACK_response): // Replace socket.end() with socket.destroy() if (this._socket) { this._socket.destroy(); } For Bug #2 (_ping_server): Distinguish between transport-level errors (actual network outage) and application-level OPC UA status codes like BadInvalidTimestamp. The latter indicates the server is reachable and the session is alive - only the timestamp validation failed. The keepalive should not trigger reconnection. REPORTER -------- Marco Velluso @Velluso [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected]) Requesting CVE assignment and credit as reporter upon fix publication.
Recommended action
Recommended action
Upgrade affected packages to a patched version: node-opcua-transport 2.170.0, node-opcua-client 2.170.0, node-opcua 2.170.0.
Technical details
- Vendor
- Not specified
- Product
- node-opcua-transport, node-opcua-client, node-opcua
- Exploitation
- none known
- Evidence
- official
Evidence and sources
This record is attributed to GitHub Advisories. Exploitation status and remediation guidance are kept separate from the vulnerability's technical severity.
Open primary source