OFFLINE
Awaiting data
Security intelligence
CriticalCritical vulnerability

CVE-2026-85724: Moquette: Pattern-ACL wildcard injection (cross-tenant authorization bypass) plus a remote-unauthenticated DoS cluster, a Will-message authorization bypass, and a cross-session durable-corruption bug

GitHub Advisories · officialPublished Sep 23, 2026Risk 50/100

moquette is reachable by untrusted MQTT clients (anonymous by default), so every byte from any client, including pre-authentication, is untrusted. This is a memory-safe JVM: the ceiling is authorization/ACL bypass + denial of service + cross-session integrity, **not RCE** (I did not find one and do not claim one). Audited at commit `da7f719a6bab9829d520b5838e13ea7b1f9be3ef`, module `broker/`. ## What a connecting client can do 1. (Critical) Bypass `pattern`-based ACLs across tenants. In `AuthorizationsCollector.canDoOperation` (AuthorizationsCollector.java:116-131, esp. line 123) the clientId/username is substituted raw into a pattern ACL rule and then wildcard-matched, and the clientId is never validated for MQTT wildcard characters +/# at CONNECT (MQTTConnection.processConnect): Topic substitutedTopic = new Topic(auth.topic.toString().replace("%c", client).replace("%u", username)); if (topic.match(substitutedTopic)) return true; A client that connects with clientId + turns sensor/%c/# into the filter sensor/+/#, gaining cross-tenant read AND write. (Precondition: pattern ACL rules configured — a common multi-tenant setup.) 2. (High) Crash the whole broker. SessionEventLoop (SessionEventLoop.java:40-54) catches only InterruptedException and is never restarted (SessionEventLoopGroup), so any uncaught exception on it wedges every co-located client. Trivially reachable inputs: malformed $share/grp SUBSCRIBE (SharedSubscriptionUtils.extractShareName -> StringIndexOutOfBoundsException), deeply nested topic (CTrie recursion -> StackOverflowError), and ACL NPE below. Unbounded subscriptions / retained / in-flight / topic-alias / interceptor state (BrokerInterceptor uses an unbounded queue) also allow OOM; durable stores allow disk exhaustion. 3. (High) NPE in ACL sink on clientId # (invalid filter sensor/#/# -> null tokens -> Topic.match NPE at Topic.java:173). 4. (High) Will-message authorization bypass. Last-Will topic is published (PostOffice.publishWill) without canWrite/reserved-topic checks used for normal PUBLISH. 5. (Medium) Cross-session durable corruption. H2PersistentQueue opens queue_"+clientId and queue_"+clientId+"_meta; client id sensor_meta collides with victim sensor metadata map -> corrupts head/tail. 6. (Medium) Fail-open if authenticator/authorizator class fails to load -> PermitAll/AcceptAll (Server.java:483-531). ## Proof of concept Source-only, no network; PoCs run on JDK 17: - PoCPatternAcl — clientId + gains cross-tenant read/write; clientId # triggers NPE - PoCSharedSubCrash — extractShareName("$share/grp") throws StringIndexOutOfBoundsException - PoCMapCollision — H2 MVStore collision overwrites victim metadata pointer ## Impact Cross-tenant eavesdropping and injection, whole-broker DoS, unauthorized Will publishes, and cross-session durable corruption. ## Remediation 1. Reject clientId/username containing +/# (and / if structural) at CONNECT; expand %c/%u as literal tokens. 2. Harden SessionEventLoop (catch Throwable + restart supervision) and validate $share filters. 3. Apply authorization to Will publishes like normal PUBLISH. 4. Add resource caps (connections, queues, retained, aliases, interceptor queue) + bounded session expiry. 5. Separate H2 namespaces and fail closed on auth-class load failure.

Upgrade affected packages to a patched version: io.moquette:moquette-broker 0.18.1.

Vendor
Not specified
Product
io.moquette:moquette-broker
Exploitation
none known
Evidence
official
CVSS
9.6

This record is attributed to GitHub Advisories. Exploitation status and remediation guidance are kept separate from the vulnerability's technical severity.

Open primary source