OFFLINE
Awaiting data
Security intelligence
CriticalCritical vulnerability

CVE-2026-10561: Langflow: PythonREPLComponent executes unsandboxed Python code, enabling authenticated RCE and privilege escalation

GitHub Advisories · officialPublished Oct 6, 2026Risk 50/100

### Summary Langflow's built-in Python interpreter components — `PythonREPLComponent` (Python Interpreter) and the legacy `PythonREPLToolComponent` (Python REPL Tool) — executed arbitrary user- or model-supplied Python code inside flows without effective sandboxing. Because the code ran in-process with the privileges of the Langflow service, any **authenticated** user who could edit and run a flow could achieve remote code execution and, from there, escalate privileges to superuser (e.g. by opening a database session and flipping `is_superuser`) or compromise the host. **This issue is fixed as of 1.10.1**, with additional hardening through 1.12.3. See *Remediation* below. ### Affected - **Package:** `langflow` (PyPI), and the underlying `lfx` package that ships the component. - **Vulnerable versions:** `< 1.10.1`. - **Patched:** `1.10.1` (core fix). Upgrade to `>= 1.12.3` for the complete hardening series. ### Details The root cause is **code injection** (CWE-94/CWE-95): the component passed raw input to LangChain's `PythonREPL`, which is explicitly *not* a security sandbox. Two distinct weaknesses existed before 1.10.1: 1. **Unrestricted builtins (default deployments).** `get_globals()` built the `exec` globals from the `global_imports` allow-list but never set `__builtins__`. CPython's `exec()` then auto-injected the full `builtins` module, leaving `__import__`, `open`, `eval`, `exec` and the whole import machinery reachable regardless of the allow-list — e.g. `__import__("os").system(...)` or `__import__("subprocess").check_output([...])`. This made the "only modules in Global Imports can be used" guarantee false, and it applied even with the **default** configuration (`allow_custom_components=True`). 2. **No server-policy gate (locked-down deployments).** Even a deployment hardened with `allow_custom_components=False` could still run interpreter code, because the components did not consult that policy before executing. Both let an authenticated user run the reported PoC, which opens a DB session and sets `is_superuser = True` on their account, or writes to the filesystem / runs OS commands with the service's privileges. ### PoC (as reported) 1. Authenticate as a normal user. 2. Create a flow with the `PythonREPLComponent`. 3. Execute Python that imports Langflow internals and elevates the account: ```python import asyncio from sqlmodel import select from langflow.services.database.models.user.model import User from langflow.services.deps import session_scope async def escalate(): async with session_scope() as session: stmt = select(User).where(User.username == 'testuser') user = (await session.exec(stmt)).first() if user: user.is_superuser = True session.add(user) await session.commit() asyncio.run(escalate()) ``` ### Impact Any authenticated user could: - Execute arbitrary Python / OS commands with the Langflow service's privileges (RCE). - Escalate their own account to superuser via direct database access. - Read/modify data and configuration, and potentially pivot to the underlying host. ### Remediation Upgrade to **Langflow 1.10.1 or later** (preferably **>= 1.12.3**). The interpreter components were hardened with layered, defense-in-depth controls, applied in `run_python_repl()` before any code is executed: - **Restricted builtins** — `get_globals()` injects a curated `safe_builtins()` mapping, removing `__import__`, `eval`, `exec`, `compile`, `open`, `input`, `globals`/`locals`/`vars`, `getattr`/`setattr`, etc. (#13397) - **AST validation** — `validate_code_safety()` rejects inline `import`/`from ... import`, dunder/escape-gadget attribute access (`__class__`, `__subclasses__`, `__globals__`, frame/traceback introspection) and format-string dunder traversal. (#13397) - **Server-policy gate** — `ensure_code_execution_enabled()` refuses to run when `allow_custom_components=False` or `block_code_interpreter_components=True`, and **fails closed** if the settings stack cannot be resolved. (#13700 — this advisory — and #14375) - **Allow-listed module proxies** — imported modules are exposed via a proxy that blocks reaching `sys.modules["os"]` through a module's transitive import graph. (#15198) - **Optional hardware isolation** — configure `LANGFLOW_SANDBOX_BACKEND` to run interpreter code in an isolated microVM instead of in-process. (#14400) Upstream fix references: #13397, #13700 (carries this GHSA), #14375, #14400, #15198. ### Hardening recommendations for operators - Keep Langflow updated (>= 1.12.3). - For locked-down deployments, set `LANGFLOW_ALLOW_CUSTOM_COMPONENTS=false` (or `LANGFLOW_BLOCK_CODE_INTERPRETER_COMPONENTS=true`) to disable the interpreter entirely. - For deployments that must run untrusted code, configure `LANGFLOW_SANDBOX_BACKEND` for microVM isolation. - Run the Langflow service as an unprivileged user with least-privilege database credentials.

Upgrade affected packages to a patched version: langflow 1.10.1.

Vendor
Not specified
Product
langflow
Exploitation
none known
Evidence
official
CVSS
9.9

This record is attributed to GitHub Advisories. Exploitation status and remediation guidance are kept separate from the vulnerability's technical severity.

Open primary source