OFFLINE
Awaiting data
Security intelligence
MajorCritical vulnerability

CVE-2026-63198: traQ: Privilege escalation by OAuth prompt=none request

GitHub Advisories · officialPublished Nov 9, 2026Risk 37/100

In OAuth2 silent authorization (`prompt=none`), when the `scope` parameter was empty or omitted, all scopes registered for the OAuth client became eligible for issuance. However, the prior consent check was performed against the empty requested scope set. As a result, an attacker could obtain an access token with broader scopes than the user had previously consented to, without requiring additional consent. ## Impact If an attacker controls an OAuth client capable of receiving authorization codes, and a user has already consented to only a subset of that client’s scopes, the attacker may be able to obtain a token containing all scopes registered for that client by sending an authorization request with `prompt=none` and an empty or omitted `scope`. If the user has not consented to the client at all, `consent_required` is returned as usual. ## Patches This issue has been fixed in v3.28.3. After the fix, the consent check for `prompt=none` verifies the scopes that will actually be issued, rather than the empty requested scope set. If the user has not consented to all scopes after expansion, `consent_required` is returned. traQ also recommends revoking any existing OAuth tokens created before the fix if they were potentially affected. ## Workarounds If users cannot update immediately, they should apply the following mitigations: - Disable untrusted OAuth clients, minimize registered client scopes, and revoke existing tokens - Reject authorization requests with `prompt=none` where `scope` is empty or omitted

Upgrade affected packages to a patched version: github.com/traPtitech/traQ 1.0.0-rc.2.0.20260629134940-5510fe8aa9bb.

Vendor
Not specified
Product
github.com/traPtitech/traQ
Exploitation
none known
Evidence
official
CVSS
7.3

This record is attributed to GitHub Advisories. Exploitation status and remediation guidance are kept separate from the vulnerability's technical severity.

Open primary source